- First I had them stand up front. That seemed unnecessary so I let them stand where they were.
- I had a hard time not correcting the students. Sometimes there is a lot to add.
- 20 minutes got us through three groups. I am going to have to do better than that on Monday.
- I need to be more specific in what they are looking for.
- How do I make this an effective means of teaching and allowing students to participate in the learning experience?
- I need to think about this
I felt like discussion about how to actually write an introduction was good. Finally I am talking about writing. Students asked questions, questions I could answer.
Monday plan -
- Discuss body paragraphs - refer to Chua essay and project 1 handout
- Discuss conclusions - refer to Chua essay and project 1 handout
- Go over some strategies commonly used in Pinker's piece. Prepare handout. Find those strategies in the piece.
- What role does the use of section titles play?
- Where does Pinker establish his ethos?
- What role does pathos play in this piece? Why is it minimal? What is Pinker doing?
- What role does logos play?
- Anticipatory refutation? Where do we see this?
- Where do we see distributions?
- Where do we see analogies? What do these do?
- How does he use authoritative quotations
- He uses lots of scientific evidence. What is he DOING?
- 11:30 - groups
Whew!